Post by david on Jul 16, 2020 17:03:54 GMT
Dear friends,
In the 1950's and 60's, people thought that action should be immediate and forceful, and was inhibited by thought. There was a reaction against this by some people thinking that action should come from the mind and not the physical. In the late 1960's spiritual development became popular, and people started saying "Not intellect - spirit." People then began to believe that spiritual development was attained by overcoming the intellect.
If you look carefully at commercial art depicting a human figure, you will see that it is focussed to draw attention away from the face to the body. In a facial portrait, it draws attention away from the eyes to the lower face. The object of this is to stop the depiction looking thoughtful. People are seeing the spirit as coming from the physical.
In his book Cutting Through Spiritual Materialism, Chogyam Trungpa says that materialism comes from the ego, which is created by the intellect. He holds that it is intellect which is spiritual materialism. His solution is to act directly from the situation. This means that the situation cannot be seen as a reflection of a higher reality. That would not enable action to come directly from it. The situation is seen as a thing in itself. This is taking the physical as the highest principle, and using matter to overcome spiritual materialism.
People have concluded that to act from the spirit, we act from matter. If you say that we must act from thought, they say that you confuse the spirit with the rational intellect.
This perspective comes from seeing the spirit as another faculty. We have several faculties: intellect, will, love, vitality, etc. The faculties are all different from each other. Love is not vitality. They see that in addition to this, we have the spirit as another faculty, different from the others, so we cannot act from the others if we act from the spirit. They don't believe this does not prevent us from acting from love, and they don't explain this inconsistency.
The truth is, that the spirit is not another faculty. It is the whole. The spirit is everything, and everything comes from the spirit. Nothing comes from matter. Evil and unpleasantness are distorted manifestations of the spirit. This means that when we use one of our faculties, we use a manifestation of the spirit. The intellect is a manifestation of the spirit.
So, if we act from the spirit, we still have the choice that we had in the 1950's of acting from the intellect or the physical, and the arguments are the same. Physical action is aggressive and mental action is controlled and enables you to know what to do.
May She be with you,
David.